6
edits
Dinglebatz (talk | contribs) m (Error in power conversion. Used Icarus vs Power Plant efficiency.) |
Dinglebatz (talk | contribs) m (Combustible Unit from 50 to 80 pct) Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
| [[File:Icon_Energetic_Graphite.png|link=Energetic_Graphite]] || 100 || Material, Chemical || data-sort-value="6750" | 6.75 MJ || data-sort-value="675000" | 675 MJ || +50% || [[File:Icon_Thermal_Power_Station.png|link=Thermal_Power_Station]] || 2.5 s || 24 || 15 || 30 || 75 | | [[File:Icon_Energetic_Graphite.png|link=Energetic_Graphite]] || 100 || Material, Chemical || data-sort-value="6750" | 6.75 MJ || data-sort-value="675000" | 675 MJ || +50% || [[File:Icon_Thermal_Power_Station.png|link=Thermal_Power_Station]] || 2.5 s || 24 || 15 || 30 || 75 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[File:Icon_Combustible_Unit.png|link=Combustible_Unit]] || 100 || Material, Chemical || data-sort-value="9720" | 9.72 MJ || data-sort-value="972000" | 972 MJ || + | | [[File:Icon_Combustible_Unit.png|link=Combustible_Unit]] || 100 || Material, Chemical || data-sort-value="9720" | 9.72 MJ || data-sort-value="972000" | 972 MJ || +80% || [[File:Icon_Thermal_Power_Station.png|link=Thermal_Power_Station]] || 3.6 s || 16.67|| 21.6|| 43.2|| 108 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[File:Icon_Explosive_Unit.png|lnk=Explosive_Unit]]||100||Material, Chemical|| data-sort-value="21600" |21.6 MJ || data-sort-value="2160000" |2.16 GJ||+ 120%||[[File:Icon_Thermal_Power_Station.png|link=Thermal_Power_Station]]|| 8 s||7.5|| 48 || 96 || 240 | | [[File:Icon_Explosive_Unit.png|lnk=Explosive_Unit]]||100||Material, Chemical|| data-sort-value="21600" |21.6 MJ || data-sort-value="2160000" |2.16 GJ||+ 120%||[[File:Icon_Thermal_Power_Station.png|link=Thermal_Power_Station]]|| 8 s||7.5|| 48 || 96 || 240 | ||
Line 115: | Line 115: | ||
#Sorters (2 per Smelter, 1 per Station): 39 * 18 kW = 0.702 MW. | #Sorters (2 per Smelter, 1 per Station): 39 * 18 kW = 0.702 MW. | ||
*Net power production: 32.4 MW - 1.68 MW - 4.32 MW - 0.702 MW = '''25.698 MW'''. | *Net power production: 32.4 MW - 1.68 MW - 4.32 MW - 0.702 MW = '''25.698 MW'''. | ||
=== Burning Combustible Unit === | |||
*Smelting 12 Coal/s needs 12 Smelters, and results in 4 Combustible Units/s. | |||
* Power Stations needed to burn 6 Combustible Unit/s: 4 * 9.72 MJ * 0.8 / 2.16 MW = 14.4 Stations. | |||
*Power production: 14.4 Stations * 2.16 MW = 31.104 MW. | |||
*Power consumption: | |||
1. Mining Machines: 4 * 420 kW = 1.68 MW. | |||
2. Smelters: 12 * 360 kW = 4.32 MW. | |||
3. Sorters (2 per Smelter, 1 per Station): 39 * 18 kW = 0.702 MW. | |||
*Net power production: 31.104 MW - 1.68 MW - 4.32 MW - 0.702 MW = '''24.402 MW'''. | |||
====Conclusion==== | ====Conclusion==== | ||
The increased effort of smelting Energetic Graphite from Coal results in ~1.7 MW more net power production. | The increased effort of smelting Energetic Graphite from Coal results in ~1.7 MW more net power production. | ||
*Coal: 24.024 MW | *Coal: 24.024 MW | ||
*Energetic Graphite: 25.698 MW. | *Energetic Graphite: 25.698 MW | ||
*Combustible Unit: 24.402 MW. | |||
===Crude Oil vs. Refined Oil vs. X-Ray Cracking vs. Hydrogen Fuel Rods=== | ===Crude Oil vs. Refined Oil vs. X-Ray Cracking vs. Hydrogen Fuel Rods=== |
edits